Fetch real-time data from 100+ websites,No development or maintenance required.
Over 100 million real residential IPs from genuine users across 190+ countries.
SCRAPING SOLUTIONS
Get accurate and in real-time results sourced from Google, Bing, and more.
With 120+ prebuilt and custom scrapers ready for any use case.
No blocks, no CAPTCHAs—unlock websites seamlessly at scale.
Execute scripts in stealth browsers with full rendering and automation
PROXY INFRASTRUCTURE
Over 100 million real residential IPs from genuine users across 190+ countries.
Reliable mobile data extraction, powered by real 4G/5G mobile IPs.
For time-sensitive tasks, utilize residential IPs with unlimited bandwidth.
Fast and cost-efficient IPs optimized for large-scale scraping.
SCRAPING SOLUTIONS
PROXY INFRASTRUCTURE
DATA FEEDS
Full details on all features, parameters, and integrations, with code samples in every major language.
LEARNING HUB
ALL LOCATIONS Proxy Locations
TOOLS
RESELLER
Get up to 50%
Contact sales:partner@thordata.com
Products $/GB
Fetch real-time data from 100+ websites,No development or maintenance required.
Get real-time results from search engines. Only pay for successful responses.
Execute scripts in stealth browsers with full rendering and automation.
Bid farewell to CAPTCHAs and anti-scraping, scrape public sites effortlessly.
Dataset Marketplace Pre-collected data from 100+ domains.
Over 100 million real residential IPs from genuine users across 190+ countries.
Reliable mobile data extraction, powered by real 4G/5G mobile IPs.
For time-sensitive tasks, utilize residential IPs with unlimited bandwidth.
Fast and cost-efficient IPs optimized for large-scale scraping.
Data for AI $/GB
Pricing $0/GB
Docs $/GB
Full details on all features, parameters, and integrations, with code samples in every major language.
Resource $/GB
EN $/GB
产品 $/GB
AI数据 $/GB
定价 $0/GB
产品文档 $/GB
资源 $/GB
简体中文 $/GB
Blog
Residential ProxiesThe AI scaling laws show that performance tends to improve as models are trained on more parameters, more compute, and, critically, more data. In other words, larger models require exponentially larger datasets to sustain performance gains.
Historically, real web data has served as the foundation of modern AI training, but high-quality web data is finite. Famously, Elon Musk stated that AI companies have run out of training data and have “exhausted” the sum of human knowledge available for model training.
On top of that, web data is increasingly duplicated and expensive to collect, clean, and legally vet. This also highlights the importance of selecting web dataset providers that deliver AI-optimized, regularly updated, and privacy-compliant datasets.
These pressures are accelerating interest in alternative data sources, particularly synthetic data. According to Gartner, by 2030, synthetic data is expected to overshadow real-world data in AI model training. The firm attributes this shift to stricter privacy requirements, real-world data scarcity, and organizations seeking lower-cost alternatives that reduce legal and compliance risks.

At the same time, this prediction should be viewed as an estimate rather than an inevitability. The internet continues to generate enormous volumes of content, with approximately 402 million terabytes of web data created every day!
To put it into perspective, GPT-3 was trained on roughly 45 terabytes of raw text before filtering. This comparison suggests that web-scale human-generated data remains vast and highly relevant for AI training.
As a result, the future of AI training is unlikely to depend exclusively on synthetic data. Instead, many machine learning experts expect a hybrid approach, a topic we will examine later in this article.
In the following chapters, you will learn what synthetic data and real web data are, what they offer, and how they compare across multiple aspects of AI model training. We will begin with real web data, as it is more natural to grasp, and then move on to synthetic data.
For an immediate high-level comparison, take a look at the synthetic data vs real web data table below:
| Real Web Data | Synthetic Data | |
| Definition | Data collected from real web sources | Artificially generated data that mimics real-world distributions using models or rules |
| Examples | Web pages, forums, news articles, product pages, PDFs, etc. | LLM-generated text, GAN images, simulated robotics environments, rule-based datasets, etc. |
| Primary goal | Capture real-world complexity and natural behavior | Increase scale, coverage, and controllability |
| Data types | Unstructured (text, images), semi-structured (JSON, XML) | Structured, semi-structured, unstructured (text, image, audio, video) |
| How it is obtained | Mainly web scraping | LLM generation, GANs, VAEs, rule-based systems, simulation engines |
| Privacy risk | Higher (PII, compliance required) | Low (no real user data if properly generated) |
| Data quality | Noisy, inconsistent, but authentic | Clean, structured, but may include artifacts or hallucinations |
| Distribution | Natural, real-world distribution | Controlled but may introduce synthetic bias or shift |
| Robustness | Strong generalization to real-world inputs | Strong for targeted scenarios, weaker generalization |
| Long-tail coverage | Naturally present but sparse | Can be explicitly generated and oversampled |
| Bias risk | Reflects real-world bias | Can amplify or introduce new bias |
| Typical pipeline role | Pretraining, fine-tuning, evaluation | Pretraining, augmentation, edge-case generation |
| Risks | Data scarcity, compliance constraints, noise | Synthetic-to-real gap, model collapse, hallucinated patterns |
Now, it is time to dive into the two core data paradigms shaping modern AI training!
Here, we will cover everything you need to know about real web data for AI model training.
Web data is information collected from web pages and other public web sources, mostly via web scraping. It includes unstructured content such as text, images, code, metadata, and documents (e.g., PDFs), as well as semi-structured data like JSON and XML.
There are many possible categories of web data. Still, at a high level, especially in the context of AI, it is useful to distinguish between two main types:
Together, these two forms of web data serve complementary roles in modern AI systems.
To source web data for AI/ML training, you need a scalable web scraping pipeline. Building that in-house requires significant engineering expertise.
It involves handling a wide range of anti-scraping challenges like IP blocking, CAPTCHA solving, and rate limiters. Plus, it entails strong data engineering capabilities for cleaning, deduplication, and normalization. As a result, companies prefer to rely on dedicated web data platforms, such as Throdata.
Throdata provides an end-to-end ecosystem for web data collection and delivery. What makes it stand out is its 400M+ residential proxy network across 195 countries, which supports highly scalable and concurrent web data collection. This enterprise-grade infrastructure is also compliant with GDPR and CCPA, along with other privacy and security standards.
Throdata’s offering for web data includes:
– Web Unlocker API: Bypasses blocks and CAPTCHAs to ensure data access on any web page.
– SERP API: Delivers structured, real-time search engine results from Google, Bing, Yandex, and others.
– Discover API: Returns a ranked, live set of URLs from the public web, ready for downstream processing.
– Crawl API: Performs scalable website crawling and structured data extraction.
– Scraper APIs: Cover 120+ websites for direct structured data extraction from popular domains.
Throdata also offers managed services for turnkey data acquisition. These enable organizations to focus on model development rather than data engineering.
In this chapter, you will explore synthetic data usage for AI/ML model training.
Synthetic data is artificially generated information that replicates the statistical patterns and characteristics of real-world data. Instead of being collected from real events, it is produced artificially.
Synthetic data can be categorized:
– Fully synthetic: Generated entirely from scratch using machine learning models trained on real data. Because it contains no original data points, it offers the highest level of privacy protection.
– Partially synthetic: Takes an existing real dataset and replaces only the sensitive attributes (like names, addresses, or Social Security numbers) with artificial values. This preserves specific data trends while anonymizing PII.
– Hybrid: Blends real, anonymized records with artificially generated ones. This is commonly used to “upsample” or enrich datasets by artificially creating rare events (e.g., adding synthetic fraud records to a banking dataset).
– Structured data: Highly organized, quantitative data presented in tabular formats.
– Unstructured data: Qualitative or media-heavy data formats. It includes synthetic text, artificially generated images, video, and audio.
At a high level, synthetic data can be generated using three predominant approaches:
Let’s now compare several aspects to understand the consequences of using synthetic vs real web data for AI training.
Web data closely approximates a natural data distribution. It captures the inherent complexity of human language and behavior as it appears in the real world. This brings important benefits, including natural correlations between features, authentic edge cases, diverse linguistic styles, and realistic noise such as human mistakes, ambiguity, and inconsistencies.
However, real-world web data is also inherently messy. It is often imbalanced, duplicated, difficult to curate at scale, and may contain low-quality or spammy content that requires extensive filtering.
In contrast, synthetic data represents a controlled distribution. It is intentionally designed and generated, allowing practitioners to shape dataset properties in a precise way. This enables balanced class distributions, targeted coverage of specific scenarios, rare event generation, and structured curriculum learning.
At the same time, synthetic data introduces important risks, including distribution shift, unrealistic artifacts, mode collapse, and over-regularization when the generator is too constrained.
Important: A central machine learning concept in this regard is the synthetic-to-real gap, similar to the sim-to-real problem in robotics. Models trained heavily on synthetic data may underperform on realistic inputs because the generated distribution does not fully match reality.
Real web data naturally includes a wide range of knowledge. This includes obscure facts, rare events, and unexpected edge cases that emerge organically from human activity. Yet, these long-tail examples are inherently sparse. By definition, rare events appear infrequently, which makes it difficult for models to learn robust patterns from them during training.
On the other hand, you can use synthetic data to explicitly generate rare or underrepresented scenarios. That way, you can target specific gaps in a dataset and improve coverage where real data is insufficient. Examples include rare coding bugs and low-resource languages.
A major advantage of using synthetic data for long-tail coverage is the ability to oversample rare events. This can help reduce class imbalance and improve model performance on infrequent but important cases. Still, if rare scenarios are artificially overrepresented, the model’s learned priors may become distorted.
For example, if cybersecurity exploit cases are heavily oversampled in synthetic data, the model may start to overpredict their likelihood in real-world settings. As a result, careful calibration is fundamental to ensure that synthetic long-tail generation improves coverage without introducing unrealistic distributions.
As mentioned earlier, companies rarely build their own web scraping and dataset infrastructure. Instead, they rely on third-party data providers such as Bright Data, which abstract away crawling, unblocking, cleaning, and delivery. This fundamentally shifts both the cost structure and the privacy tradeoffs of data acquisition.
Below is a simplified overview of Throdata’s pricing model for web data collection:
| Price | Custom plans for enterprises | GDPR compliant | CCPA compliant | Compliant to SEC regulations | |
| Datasets | From $0.001 to $0.0025 per record | ✔️ | ✔️ | ✔️ | ✔️ |
| Web scraping APIs | $1-$1.5/1K results | ✔️ | ✔️ | ✔️ | ✔️ |
Throdata also provides data annotation services, helping organizations further reduce reliance on in-house data engineering. Importantly, its data is aligned with privacy frameworks, which helps reduce legal and regulatory risk.
Without such web data providers, you would have to handle infrastructure development, ongoing maintenance, and the complex governance of PII, copyrighted material, and sensitive behavioral data internally.
With synthetic data, the primary costs come from inference compute and access to teacher models or APIs. From a privacy perspective, artificially generated data offers an inherent advantage. Because it is generated rather than collected from real individuals, synthetic data naturally eliminates exposure to personally identifiable information.
Now, the right choice between synthetic and real web data depends on quality requirements, scale, privacy constraints, and the target use case. Depending on these factors, either approach can be more cost-effective or more expensive than the other.
Web data generally provides weak supervision. Models learn from naturally occurring signals such as next-token prediction, metadata, and human-generated content. The problem is that real data is noisy and can contain misinformation, contradictions, spam, biased opinions, and inconsistent formatting.
On the contrary, synthetic data offers greater control over quality and supervision. It can provide perfectly formatted labels, structured outputs, step-by-step reasoning, and automatically verified examples. For instance, synthetic datasets can include mathematically verified answers or code snippets validated through unit tests. This improves consistency and makes targeted training easier.
The major risk with synthetic data is that its quality is fundamentally bounded by the quality of the generating model, algorithm, or underlying approach. Generated hallucinations or factual errors can propagate into the final dataset, causing models to learn confidently incorrect patterns. Similarly, hidden biases present in generation systems may also be inherited by downstream models. On the bright side, synthetic data supports stronger alignment and safety tuning.
One of the most important questions in machine learning is how well a model generalizes to unseen inputs. In other terms, which data source leads to better robustness under distribution shift: real-world web data or synthetic data?
Web data tends to achieve strong robustness, as it reflects naturally occurring human behavior, language, and noise. This improves performance on out-of-distribution inputs and enhances domain transfer, particularly when models are deployed in unpredictable environments.
Instead, synthetic data is better suited for targeted optimization. It lets you precisely devise training examples for specific skills, edge cases, or rare scenarios.
Now that you know the differences between synthetic and web data, you are ready to see the practical implications of using each approach in the AI model training.
When relying on web data, the pipeline typically follows these steps:
When it comes to synthetic data pipelines, the steps are more generation-focused:
As you can tell, real web data pipelines focus on cleaning noisy real-world inputs. Instead, synthetic pipelines are more about controlling and validating generated outputs. Finally, once the training dataset has been produced, you can then proceed with training the AI model.
The final question is whether synthetic data can outperform real-world web data.
A recent paper in AI for Requirements Engineering (AI4RE) suggests that LLM-generated datasets can be a strong alternative when real data is scarce or difficult to access. Empirical results show that models trained exclusively on synthetic data can outperform those trained solely on human-authored datasets. In detail, improvements of up to +37% in precision and +30% in recall were observed compared to real-data-only baselines.
That said, this is not a binary or absolute conclusion. The evidence does not suggest that synthetic data should fully replace real data, but rather that the best performance is often achieved through a hybrid approach. Learn more about it!
The debate between synthetic and real-world web data is no longer about choosing one over the other, but about how to combine them.
Recent evidence shows that hybrid configurations combining synthetic and real data achieve gains of up to +85% in precision and a doubling of recall compared to using only real-world web data.
At the same time, multiple studies and industry reports highlight that naïvely mixing synthetic and real samples can actually degrade performance due to distribution mismatch, redundancy, or bias amplification. This makes it clear that performance gains depend on careful dataset design rather than simple data accumulation.
A key open question is the optimal ratio between synthetic and real data. There is no universal answer. Some practitioners adopt a Pareto-style 80/20 split (mostly real data with synthetic augmentation), while others prefer more balanced mixes such as 60/40, depending on task complexity, domain risk, and data availability.
Similarly, the placement of synthetic data in the pipeline matters. Industry practice guides a staged strategy: synthetic-heavy pre-training for coverage, followed by real-data fine-tuning for grounding and evaluation.
Ultimately, hybrid pipelines work best because they combine complementary strengths. Synthetic data provides scale and edge-case coverage, while real web data ensures fidelity, realism, and reliable evaluation in production environments.
As a summary section, see the advantages and disadvantages of the two data paradigms.
👍 Pros:
👎 Cons:
👍 Pros:
👎 Cons:
👍 Pros:
👎 Cons:
In this synthetic data vs real web data blog post, you learned the impact of using real-world or artificially generated data for AI/ML model training. As is always the case in these situations, there is no single winner. The right approach depends on your specific budget, technical skills, and performance goals.
No matter the setup, web data still plays a central role in AI model training, whether for pre-training or final fine-tuning. Its broad coverage and real-world grounding make it essential. However, some companies prefer to opt for more synthetic-heavy approaches. The main reason is the complexity of building and maintaining web data retrieval pipelines in-house.
This is where Throdata can help. With enterprise-grade, highly scalable, and compliant infrastructure, it provides:
In addition, Throdata offers data annotation services. It provides scalable, accurate, and customizable labeling solutions for NLP, computer vision, and speech recognition use cases.
Discover all Throdata olutions for AI!
Create a Bright Data account for free and explore our web data solutions!
Looking for
Top-Tier Residential Proxies?
您在寻找顶级高质量的住宅代理吗?
Data Collection Stuck? Three Rotating IP Strategies Help
Have you ever written hundreds ...
Kael Odin
2026-07-17
Scraping Multimedia Data for AI Training: Images, Video, Audio
TL;DR Understanding multimedia data types and how they& […]
Unknown
2026-07-15
How to Scrape All Text From a Website: Methods, Tools, and Best Practices
Text scraping includes discove ...
Xyla Huxley
2026-07-15
Buy Box 一夜易主,利润和流量同时流失:购物车归属监控客户的实时预警方案
对依赖 Amazon 等平台销售的品牌和授权经销商来说,Bu ...
Xyla Huxley
2026-07-15
未授权卖家不是价格问题,而是渠道失控信号:品牌如何监控异常店铺与跨区流通
品牌方常常在销量下降或价格混乱后,才发现渠道已经出现异常。某 ...
Xyla Huxley
2026-07-15
本地商家数据不是地图截图:Google Maps、Yelp、Tripadvisor 场景下的评分、营业时间与门店状态监控
本地商家数据对很多行业都很关键:连锁餐饮要看门店评分,酒店集 ...
Xyla Huxley
2026-07-15
名录数据过期,销售团队就会追错客户:B2B 目录采集客户的线索质量难题
B2B 目录采集听起来像是一个简单任务:拿到企业名录、门店信 ...
Xyla Huxley
2026-07-15
差评不是客服问题,而是产品路线图信号:评价与舆情采集客户如何找出真实用户痛点
很多品牌把评论当作客服部门的工作:有差评就回复,有问答就补充 ...
Xyla Huxley
2026-07-15
How to Use a ChatGPT Proxy: Step-by-Step Setup, Tips & Safe Alternatives
ChatGPT Proxy lets you send your ChatGPT traffic throug […]
Unknown
2026-07-14